Social Fetch vs SociaVault
Both are direct REST APIs with prepaid credits that never expire. The split is unit economics at volume, response consistency, and whether you want a TypeScript SDK and requestId on every call.
Last updated: 2026-07-21
At a glance
The rows teams scan first before reading the full page — how each product expects you to integrate, who runs the upstream fetch, and what billing looks like at a headline level. Numbers and sources are in the pricing section below; this table is the orientation pass.
| Social Fetch | SociaVault | |
|---|---|---|
| What you're comparing | Direct social REST API | Direct social REST API |
| Billing model | PAYG packs never expire; optional monthly plans | PAYG packs never expire; no subscription required |
| Per 1,000 credits (best published pack) | $1.65 (Scale pack) | $2.00 (Enterprise pack) / $2.65 (Pro pack) |
| 75k lookups | ~$124 one-time at Scale rate | $199 one-time (Pro pack, exactly 75k) |
| Free trial | 100 credits, no card, no expiration | 50 credits, no card, no expiration |
| Catalog shape | 165 ops / 21 platforms, normalized envelope | 25+ platforms claimed; credit cost varies by endpoint complexity |
Closest peer in the category
Unlike Actors, proxies, or marketplaces, SociaVault is a first-party social API with prepaid credits and overlapping platform coverage. This page is price at volume, response contract, and tooling — not whether either vendor is "real."
Where the per-1k math diverges
At 75k lookups: SociaVault Pro $199 vs Social Fetch ~$124 at Scale. At 200k: $399 ($2.00/1k) vs ~$330 ($1.65/1k). Entry packs favor experiments; Scale undercuts SociaVault once volume grows.
Watch the credit multiplier on "advanced" routes
Most SociaVault endpoints are one credit; docs also list 5–10 for moderate calls and 20+ for analytics. Social Fetch documents multi-credit routes in the API reference — most profile/post/search calls stay one credit.
Envelope, SDK, and support
Social Fetch: { data, meta } on every route, lookupStatus, TypeScript SDK, hosted OpenAPI. SociaVault: docs, playground, 25+ platform claims including niche surfaces (shops, Linktree). No official TypeScript SDK or normalized envelope.
When each API is the better buy
SociaVault when you need a platform or niche route we do not cover, or a $29 pack for a short project. Social Fetch when unit cost at 50k+ matters, you want requestId and SDK, or standard profile/post workloads dominate. Migration is usually a weekend of field mapping.
Who should pick which
Short lists pulled from the sections above — not a scorecard. If your situation matches the right column, SociaVault is probably the better buy even if Social Fetch wins more checkboxes down the page.
When Social Fetch is the better fit
- Production volume where $1.65/1k undercuts SociaVault's $2.00–$2.65 pack rates
- Teams that want one { data, meta } envelope and a requestId on every response
- TypeScript SDK + hosted OpenAPI as first-class integration surface
- Standard profile/post/search workloads where one credit means one credit
When SociaVault is the better fit
- You need platforms or shop/ad-library routes Social Fetch does not expose
- A $29 Starter pack covers a short project and you will not scale past it
- You already built per-network parsers and do not care about a shared envelope
- Their specific endpoint (e.g. a shop or Linktree route) is load-bearing for your product
Same credit idea — different dollars per thousand
SociaVault packs: Starter $29/6k ($4.83/1k), Growth $79/20k ($3.95/1k), Pro $199/75k ($2.65/1k), Enterprise $399/200k ($2.00/1k). Social Fetch Scale: $379/230k ($1.65/1k). Both say credits never expire. Most endpoints are 1 credit; docs list 5–10+ for heavier analytics — model what you actually call.
| Scenario | Social Fetch | SociaVault |
|---|---|---|
| Single standard profile lookup | ~$0.00165 | ~$0.0020–$0.0048 (1 credit, pack-dependent) |
| 75,000 standard lookups | ~$124 at Scale rate | $199 (Pro pack) |
| 200,000 standard lookups | ~$330 at Scale rate | $399 (Enterprise pack) |
| Unused credits expire? | No — PAYG packs never expire | No — packs never expire |
| Required monthly subscription? | No | No |
| Heavier endpoints (comments, analytics) | Documented multi-credit routes in API reference | Docs list 5–10+ credits for moderate/complex calls |
SociaVault pricing from sociavault.com/pricing and docs.sociavault.com (July 2026). Per-credit rates assume one credit per call; check endpoint docs before budgeting analytics or bulk extraction routes.
Feature checklist
Yes means the capability is on the default path for most users. Partial usually means a different SKU, a marketplace listing that covers only some endpoints, or a workaround you have to wire yourself. A green check for SociaVault does not mean it belongs in your stack — match each row to the workflow you are actually shipping.
| Capability | Social Fetch | SociaVault |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous REST JSON (no actor run polling) | ||
| One API key for all platforms | ||
| Unified schema across platforms | ||
| Public OpenAPI specification | ||
| Official TypeScript SDK | ||
| Interactive API playground | ||
| TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, Reddit, X in one vendor | ||
| Pay-as-you-go without required monthly subscription | ||
| PAYG credits never expire | ||
| Web fetch (markdown/HTML) in same product | ||
| Scheduled account / feed monitors | ||
| Signed webhooks when watched accounts post |
Bottom line
The pricing table and feature checklist above are for narrowing the field. This section is the pick-one answer for Social Fetch vs SociaVault. If their integration shape fits your roadmap better, take it — the prose and “when they win” lists above name those cases on purpose.
Same category — Social Fetch wins on published pack rates
SociaVault is a legitimate PAYG social API peer: non-expiring credits, self-serve signup, broad platform claims. Social Fetch is cheaper at every serious pack tier we compared, ships a normalized envelope and TypeScript SDK, and documents multi-credit routes instead of burying them. Stay on SociaVault if you need their niche endpoints. Switch when the invoice is mostly standard profile and post lookups — that is the job our Scale pack is priced for.
If Social Fetch is still in the running, run one real endpoint before you buy a subscription elsewhere. The playground uses the same API key and response envelope as production — you will know in a few minutes whether the JSON shape fits your code.
Questions about this pairing
What teams ask when Social Fetch and SociaVault land on the same shortlist — migration, billing surprises, and whether the integration model changes when you add a second platform. For cross-vendor framing, start on the compare hub.
- Is SociaVault cheaper than Social Fetch?
- At published packs, usually no for standard one-credit lookups. SociaVault Pro is $2.65 per 1,000 credits; Enterprise is $2.00 per 1,000. Social Fetch Scale is $1.65 per 1,000. SociaVault can win if you only need a small Starter pack for a short project, or if a multi-credit Social Fetch specialty route outweighs their pack rate for your mix.
- Do both APIs expire unused credits?
- No. Both sell prepaid packs that never expire. That is the main reason they feel similar in procurement conversations.
- Which covers more platforms?
- SociaVault markets 25+ platforms and niche tools (shops, Linktree-style pages, extra ad libraries). Social Fetch documents 21 marketplace platforms and 165 operations in OpenAPI. Breadth of logos is not the same as depth on TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook — check the routes you actually call.
- Does SociaVault have a TypeScript SDK?
- No official SDK we could find comparable to Social Fetch's. They provide docs, examples, and a playground. Social Fetch ships an official TypeScript SDK, hosted OpenAPI, and playground tied to the same catalog.
- Are failed requests free on both?
- SociaVault states you pay for successful requests. Social Fetch does not charge lookup_failed or 503 temporarily_unavailable; completed not_found lookups still bill because the upstream ran. Read both billing FAQs before modeling retries.